Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1999 (7) TMI 210

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Respondent. [Order]. - This is a department's appeal against the impugned Order No. NK(446)/1063/94, dated 13-12-1994, praying for setting aside the same, and to allow the appeal is recover/reverse Modvat credit amount of Rs. 25,183/-. 2. The facts of the case in brief are that respondent manufactures P&P medicine following under Chapter 30 of Tariff Act, 1985, and avail Modvat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....reof was allowed, treating slag as waste under Rule 57D(1). After hearing the respondent and perusing the material available on record, Assistant Collector Division K-I, dropped the show cause notice under his order dated 10-10-1992. The department's appeal filed was rejected under the impugned order. Hence this appeal. The respondent has filed cross-objection, supporting the orders of lower autho....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....akage and so Modvat credit was available. 1988 (34) E.L.T. 55, 1990 (50) E.L.T. 314, 1988 (33) E.L.T. 124 are relied on. 4. Point for consideration is whether there are sufficient and satisfactory grounds to allow the appeal ? My answer is in the negative. 5. Perused the show cause notice, orders of lower authorities, appeal memorandum, cross-objection, and Rules 57D, 57F, 57A and ....