AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1998 (11) TMI 338
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....spondents. [Order]. - Respondents manufacture cement falling under the Chapter 25 of CETA. They were having a wet process unit and a dry process unit for manufacturing cement in the same premises until July, 1988 when they took out separate Central Excise for their dry process unit and accordingly were maintaining separate accounts statutorily prescribed. There was a declaration filed ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... them by the jurisdictional Assistant Collector on the ground that credit so utilised towards payment of duty on the final duty cleared from the dry process unit in respect of the input received in the old processing unit is not correct. The Assistant Collector adjudicated the matter and ordered that the credit amount of Rs. 2,48,048/- wrongly availed by the dry process unit be reversed/recovered ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rected the Assistant Collector to allow the Respondents credit of the amount of Rs. 2,48,048/- in their RG 23A Part II account pertaining to their wet process unit. The Collector (Appeals) also set aside the penalty on the Respondents. 4. Shri K.L. Ramteke, the learned DR reiterated the grounds of appeal and contended that utilisation of the credit in the dry process unit without any decla....