1997 (4) TMI 300
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....for the Respondents. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. - Heard the Departmental Representative. 2.  The respondent is absent and request a decision on merits. 3.  The assessee who is a respondent in this appeal had claimed the refund of the difference between the duty paid by it on gauzes made out of platinum and rhodium without claiming the benefit of notificati....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the platinum from the Minerals and Metal Trading Corpn. (MMTC) during the relevant period, but declined to consider this as evidence which would justify extending the notification benefit. 4.  Commissioner (Appeals) decided the assessee's appeal in its favour, and held that the assessee, had produced sufficient evidence. Hence this appeal by the Department. 5.  The reason for allo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... was produced before him to show that the gauzes were made out of old and used Spinnerettes sold to the assessees by M/s. Gwalior Rayon. In fact, while recording the contention of the appellant before him, he records that such refunds had been sanctioned earlier and that the benefit had been availed of earlier on the basis of the Chartered Accountant's certificate. His conclusion as reproduced abo....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI