1999 (7) TMI 179
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....G. Phene, Representative, for the Respondents. [Order per : J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. - This reference application was argued by Shri Agarwal. The assessee was represented by Shri Phene. 2. The application was received on 22-6-1998. The question of law in Column 8 of the Form No. E.A. 6 of the paper book read as follows : "Whether in the light of discussion above Modvat credit c....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t is not a declaration in the true sense for the intended purpose as prescribed because the declaration escapes the scrutiny which it needs to and should have undergone whether the Tribunal was right in holding that such declaration was a correct declaration." 5. The reasons for filing this amendment are not very clear. We are inclined to dismiss the initial application as well as the so c....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... showing the use of the inputs in the manufacture of the intermediate product. The Tribunal after taking into account both the submissions had allowed the appeal. 7. In the face of this specific finding, the department could not entertain the belief that the specific declaration was not filed at all. The manner in which the so called question of law is attempted to be framed gives the clea....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI