Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1999 (6) TMI 168

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri H.K. Jain, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. - This is an appeal for classification of a product sold in dual container, one container containing aluminium paste and the other container containing varnish. The assessee claims the classification under Chapter sub-heading 3212.90 whereas the Department holds that it is classifiable under Chapter Heading 32.0....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on he refers to HSN Notes under Chapter 32.12 and submits that the Explanatory Note of HSN clearly stipulates :- "These are concentrated dispersions of pigments including aluminium or other metal powders and flaxes" and he submits that their product is aluminium paste and therefore, even in terms of HSN Explanatory Note the product must fall under Chapter Heading 32.12. 3. Shri H.K. Jai....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ook the HSN Notes into consideration. We note further that in the two chapter headings, the basic materials are different and the ld. Commissioner has not rendered any finding on the constituents of the product for classification. Since these two issues are important and have not been dealt with specifically in the impugned order, we find it a fit case for remand. In the circumstances, the appeal ....