Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1999 (5) TMI 234

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....de the impugned order, the Commissioner has confiscated the non-alloy steel coils/circles totally valued at Rs. 3,55,005.00 belonging to the appellants under the provisions of Section 119 of the Customs Act, 1962 with an option given to them, for redemption of the same on payment of a fine of Rs. 1.00 lakh. The said goods have been confiscated on the ground that the same have been used for conceal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ve non-alloy coils. He submits that it is on this basis that the Commissioner has held that the tainted goods were concealed by the coils/circles. He submits that there is a difference between the coverage and concealment, as held by the Tribunal in the case of Mazda Chemicals v. Commissioner of Customs, Ahmedabad reported in 1996 (88) E.L.T. 767 (Tribunal). He relied upon another decision of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... As such, the Commissioner has rightly confiscated the above goods with an option to the appellants to redeem the same on payment of Rs. 1.00 lakh. 5. I have carefully considered the submissions of both sides and have also gone through the impugned order. For the purpose of Section 119 of the Customs Act, 1962, the goods are liable to confiscation only when they are used for concealment of ....