1999 (5) TMI 173

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ri K.N. Jena, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. -  The Revenue has filed the present appeal against the Order-in-Appeal Nos. 31-34/BBSR/De novo/89, dated 17-2-1989. We find that the impugned Order disposes of four appeals. The Revenue had filed four appeals against the above Order out of which three have already been disposed of by the Tribunal, vid....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to the Department, amounts to wilful suppression of the same and the Department was entitled to invoke the extended period of limitation. 3. Shri K.N. Jena, learned Advocate appearing for the respondents relies upon the above referred Order of the Tribunal vide which three appeals filed by the Department against the same impugned Order were rejected. 4. We have considered the submi....