Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1998 (5) TMI 219

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Srivastava, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice U.L. Bhat, President]. - These appeals are directed against the common Order-in-Original Nos. 34 to 43/97, dated 19-2-1997 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore holding that notional interest at 18% on advances collected from buyers of many of the machinery parts manufactured and cleared by the appellant should be include....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y interest on the amounts of advances and if the interest-free advance amounts were not available appellant's prices would have gone higher than the contract prices since, if loans had been taken from finance institution, appellant would have to pay interest which would ordinarily be loaded on the price and the interest accrued on the advance amount was an extra-consideration. There is no dispute ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....levant. In Metal Box India Ltd. the Supreme Court indicated that 45% discount was given to the favoured buyer who paid a huge amount as interest free advance. These facts considered by the Supreme Court clearly indicated nexus between the receipt of advance and the discount given to the buyer and the price contracted with the buyer. The two decisions of the Tribunal referred to also indicate the r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... aspect of nexus between the price and the receipt of the advance was not adverted to in the decision in the manner contemplated in the Metal Box decision of the Supreme Court. 5. The goods manufactured by the appellant were tailor-made goods. Machine parts ordered by a particular buyer in the event of his failure to pay the price and accept the goods, cannot be passed on to other prospectiv....