1961 (4) TMI 9
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Constitution. The second and the third applicants are merchants who used to import considerable quantities of glass chatons upto 1957. The first applicant is an Association of merchants, some of whom were importers and some the actual users of glass chatons. Import of glass chatons - which form an important part of the raw materials for the manufacture of glass bangles and other similar articles of wear - could, be made only on licences granted by licensing authorities. Since 1955 the matter has been regulated by the Imports (Control) Order, 1955. This Order which was made by the Central Government in exercise of powers conferred by Sections 3 and 4A of the Imports and Exports Control Act, 1947, prohibited the import of a large number of g....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pondent No. 3 - the State Trading Corporation and the petitioners also prayed that the respondent No. 3 should be directed not to import on the basis of import licences already granted. 2. It has to be mentioned at once that the periods of the import permit "already granted" as referred to in the petition has already expired and consequently, the last two prayers mentioned above cannot possibly be granted. There was no application at all by the second and the third applicants, or any of the merchants who form the association, the 1st appellant for the issue of any import licences; there can be no question therefore of respondents 1 and 2 being given any preference over the petitioners in the grant of permits. Nor is there, as far as c....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Control Act, 1947. 4. The requirement as regards any goods that they cannot be imported except and in accordance with a licence is undoubtedly a restriction on the right to carry on trade in such goods and also on the right to acquire property. Learned Counsel does not however contend that by itself this requirement of Section 3 of the Imports and Exports Control Act is an unreasonable restriction. His attack is only against the further restriction which follows from the provisions in Section 6(h) of the Order that the Central Government or the Chief Controller of Imports and Exports may refuse to grant a licence or direct any licensing authority not to grant licences - "if the licensing authority decides to canalise imports and the d....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sts of the public. Even if the necessary materials were available it is possible that in many cases more than one view can be taken whether a particular policy as regards imports - whether one of heavy customs barrier or of total prohibition or of entrustment of imports to selected agencies or channels - is in the general interests of the public. In this state of things the burden on the person challenging that the Government of the country is not right in its estimate of the effects of a policy as regards imports in the general interests of the public will be very heavy indeed and when the Government decides in respect of any particular commodity that its import should be by a selected channel or through selected agencies the Court would p....