1998 (4) TMI 306

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri S. Nunthuk, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : G.A. Brahma Deva, Member (J)]. - This is an appeal filed by M/s. Khandelwal Engineering Works against the impugned order passed by the Additional Collector of Central Excise, Kanpur. 2. Shri Naveen Mallick arguing for the appellants submitted that the main issue to be considered in this case is whether the process of reshelling ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... justified the action of the Department in invoking larger period since second notice was not a notice but only a corrigendum/amendment to the earlier show cause notice. 4. We have carefully considered the matter. Without going into the merits of the case, we find that there is a substantial force in the argument advanced on behalf of the appellant on the issue of limitation. On going thro....