Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (11) TMI 179

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Respondent. [Order]. -  The matter is listed for admission of appeal filed by revenue. The issue involved is whether penalty is imposable on respondents M/s. Timetech Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. as they had imported goods without specific import licence. 2. Shri T.A. Arunachalam, learned JDR, submitted that the respondents had imported one Oakwood Laminator which was classified by th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he decision in the case of Pine Chemical Suppliers v. Collector of Customs reported in 1993 (67) E.L.T. 25 (S.C.) in which it was held that the question of mens rea is not relevant for quantum of liability of penalty under Section 112 of the Act. 3. After considering the submissions of the learned DR, I observed that the Commissioner (Appeals) while setting aside the penalty had relied upo....