Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1997 (9) TMI 296

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ification has been denied by the Revenue on the ground that the said "Art Board" (Card Board) could not be utilised by the appellants herein in the manufacture of their export product for which the value-based Advance Licence was issued and under which licence, the benefit of the said Notification is required to be made applicable. The basis of this allegation of the Department was a market-enquiry referred to in the Commissioner's Order dated 6-5-1994. That Order came up for examination in an appeal filed by the appellants herein and the Tribunal directed vide Order No. A-231/CAL/1995, dated 6-2-1995 that, since the Commissioner had arrived at his conclusion of not extending the benefit of the said Notification to the goods in question on ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....roduct and are covered by the description of inputs in the licence." He submits that no evidence has been produced by the Revenue to that effect, because if the elusive market-enquiry is kept aside that the material imported could not be used in the export product i.e. Packet Tea. In these circumstances, he submits that the impugned order be set aside and the benefit of the notification in question be extended. 2. Opposing the contentions, learned JDR, Shri R.K. Roy for the respondent Commissioner points out that the appellants herein had agreed to clear the goods vide their letters dated 2-11-1993 and 8-11-1993 on payment of duty. It has also been found by the adjudicating authority that even before issuance of the show cause notice,....