Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1998 (3) TMI 335

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r : S.S. Kang, Member (J)]. - When the case was called, none appeared on behalf of the respondents, M/s. Raj Kamal Trading Corporation in spite of service of notice as per acknowledgment on records. Therefore, the appeal is being taken for final disposal in the absence of the respondents. 2. Heard Shri R.S. Sangia, JDR, who appeared for the appellants. The respondents, M/s. Raj Kamal Tradi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e respondents filed the appeal and the Commissioner of Central Excise vide impugned order held that the respondents manufactured only metallic lamps bases, therefore they are eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 96/86-C.E., dated 10-2-1986. The plea of the Revenue in this appeal is that the goods manufactured by the respondents are not covered under the Notification. The appellants/Revenue....