Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (4) TMI 187

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cate, for the Respondent. [Order]. - The question involved in the present case whether a declaration submitted u/r 57G to the Superintendent is sufficient for the purpose of that Rule. The Lower Appellate Authority has held that in view of the Tribunal judgment in the case of Metalfab Industries reported in 1994 (74) E.L.T. 734, the declaration made to the Supdt. is valid because the concern....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e absolved of its negligence inasmuch as the Supdt. accepted the declaration and ultimately communicated to the Asstt. Collr. It cannot, therefore, be said on the submission of the ld. Advocate that no declaration was made by the respondents as alleged in the Revenue's appeal filed. 6. I agree with the submission of the learned Advocate for the respondents that Modvat credit cannot be deni....