1998 (4) TMI 187

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... The question involved in the present case whether a declaration submitted u/r 57G to the Superintendent is sufficient for the purpose of that Rule. The Lower Appellate Authority has held that in view of the Tribunal judgment in the case of Metalfab Industries reported in 1994 (74) E.L.T. 734, the declaration made to the Supdt. is valid because the concerned Supdt. is a part of the Divisional Of....