TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1997 (6) TMI 159
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t. [Order per : V.P. Gulati, Vice President]. - The prayer in the application is for dispensation of a pre-deposit of Rs. 85,910.96 demanded from the appellants for the reason that the Modvat credit was taken in respect of goods which were not covered by a valid document for Modvat purposes. 2. The learned Advocate for the appellants has pleaded that the goods had been imported and had be....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ntry which had been processed in the Custom House. His plea is since the importation has been made on their account, although the goods were transacted for importation by others, the Bill of Entry should be taken to be a valid document for purposes of Rule 57G. He has pleaded that in that view of the matter, the demand is not sustainable in law. 3. The learned JDR for the department pleads t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e that the whole matter lies in a short campus and with the consent of both the sides, by dispensing with the pre-deposit, the appeal itself is taken for disposal. 5. We observe, in both the Bills of Entry the appellants name figure as the persons on whose account the importation had been made. Their full name and address had been given in the Bill of Entry. There is no contradiction regardi....