Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1997 (5) TMI 218

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s production incentive rebate in terms of Notification 116/84 issued under Rule 56AA of Central Excise Rules. The Notification has been issued being part of a scheme of excise duty relief to encourage higher production. It was designed to encourage production by granting relief in respect of goods specified in the Table attached to the Notification produced in excess of production in a selected base year. The scheme was announced in the Finance Minister's Budget Speech of 1982. On scrutiny of the claim the jurisdictional Assistant Collector found that the claim was hit by condition B IV(a) of the Notification. This condition reads as follows :- "iv. No credit shall be allowed in respect of a factory from which clearances of the specified g....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eared specified goods from the factory earlier to 1-4-1981 as they had cleared vehicles falling under Item 34-I(3) in 1980 which is also specified goods for the purpose of the notification. It was urged, citing case law, that the notification which was essentially designed to encourage high production should not be construed in such a manner as to defeat its objective. 4. Shri D. Gurnani, ld. D.R. contended that the non-fulfilment of condition IV(a) of the notification would take the appellants claim away from the purview of the incentive rebate. The condition has to be satisfied with reference to the particular goods i.e. of Item 34-I(2) for which the appellants filed the claim. Admittedly, the first clearance of these goods was only....