Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1997 (7) TMI 223

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....der per : Lajja Ram, Member (T)]. - In this appeal filed by M/s. Garware Plastic Polyester (P) Ltd. The matter relates to the eligibility of the parts of storage batteries to the benefit of exemption Notification No. 16/55-C.E., dated 18-4-1955. The Collector, Central Excise (Appeals) Bombay had held that the parts of electric batteries falling under Item No. 31(3) of the Old Central Excise Tari....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....red by the exemption under that Notification dated 18-4-1955. 4.  There is no dispute that the appellants were engaged only in the manufacture of parts of storage batteries. They were not manufacturing the complete batteries. The parts were supplied to their customer M/s. Chloride India Ltd who were using these parts in the manufacture of complete batteries in their factory. The exemption No....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e notice the appellants had taken a plea that these containers and covers were made of plastics and the benefit available to the articles of plastics should have been extended to them. He had further submitted that they had taken this plea before the adjudicating authority but he had not discussed this issue in his order and in fact had not granted any hearing. We find that the Collector Central E....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ade before the appellate authority of the personal hearing before the adjudicating authority we consider that the norms of the principle of natural justice have been sufficiently met in this case and that the matter does not require to be remanded back to the adjudicating authority as requested by the Learned Advocate for the appellants. 7.  A point has also been made that the goods in quest....