Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1996 (9) TMI 377

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Dhar, Member (T)]. - This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. 1553/87-BCH, dated 27-3-1987 Collector of Customs (Appeals), Bombay. 2. The appellants imported flapper valve steel hardened and tempered. This was assessed to duty under C.T.H. 71.15(1) of Customs Tariff as high carbon steel strips. The appellants filed refund claim with Assistant Collector on the ground that goods....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) E.L.T. 369 (S.C.). 3. Ld. D.R. while reiterated the departmental arguments submits that the appellants ought to have been diligent in making the claim at the original stage itself. In case if exemption onus was on them to prove they are entitled to exemption. Since this claim was not made before the Assistant Collector at the original stage the adjudicating authority at that stage could no....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....laim classification of goods under different heading and the alternate ground in regard to classification is claimable at the Tribunal stage. In that case the main contention urged was that the appellants should have been permitted to raise alternate ground and that the goods in question should have been classified under Item 68 and not under Item 26AA. The Apex Court observed that it was original....