Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1994 (7) TMI 144

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rances, the appellant excluded there-from the value of clearances of fabrics returned under bond to the original supplier. 3.1. The classification lists are officially approved. The appellant discharged the duty liability to the extent payable as the Department, in response to their written request for clarification had accepted their view point. 4. It was their contention that goods cleared under bond cannot be considered as goods cleared for home consumption. In this connection, we would like to draw pointed attention to Rule 96D which relates to procedure for removal of cotton fabrics or jute manufactured from one factory to another without payment of duty for processing. 4.1. Sub-rule 3 of this Rule allows removal of the goods from one factory to another under bond whereas sub-rule 4 deals with clearance for home consumption and sub-rule 5 provides for payment of duty either by the processor or the originating factory, inter alia, that if the processed goods are removed to the original factory, such removal shall be subjected to sub-rule 3. 5. It was his submission that this Rule clearly distinguishes between clearances under home consumption and clea....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... duty shall not be required in respect of excisable goods made in a factory, if they are consumed or utilised in the same factory . . . .". In 96D the distinction between clearance under bond for a specified purpose and the clearance for home consumption becomes evident from a reading of sub-rules 3, 4, & 5 taken together and it is clear that the words cleared for home consumption incorporated in sub-rule 4 have been used in contra distinction to removal under bond to another factory under Rule 3 and removal for return of the processed fabrics to the originating factory. 10. In fact it is well known that clearance for home consumption means and implies removal of the goods for marketing or consumption or utilisation whether by the importer and/or manufacturer himself or by others whereas clearance under bond always means and implies a mere transfer of goods from one place or premises (whether factory or warehouse or docks or stores etc.) to another without payment of duty for specified purposes only. 11. Further clearance of goods for home consumption also means removal of the goods out of customs/excise charge or control and, therefore, the owner or possessor is fr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ary processing work, the same were sent back to the original manufacturer under bond without payment of duty under AR-3A and GP-2. After going through the explanations given in the Notification No. 83/83 it is clearly observed that for computation of clearance value for the purpose of Notification No. 83/83, the value of the excisable goods which are completed and which are used captively should be excluded. The Notification does not say anything about the exclusion of the value of excisable goods cleared under Bond without payment of duty. The above Notification talks of the aggregate value of clearance of excisable goods. Removal of excisable goods under Bond without payment of duty is also clearance. The Rule 96D makes provision for removal of cotton fabrics or jute manufacturers from one factory to other without payment of duty. Such removal without payment of duty is also clearance for the purpose of Central Excise. Government of India in the case of M/s. Mining and Allied Machinery Corpn. [1982 (10) ELT 517 (G.O.I.)] have observed that the word `clearance' in the Central Excise context would only mean `removal' of the goods whether on payment of duty or without payment of dut....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e said process the fabrics are cleared/sent them back without payment of duty under Bond under cover of AR 3s and GP 2s. In these circumstances, it is evident that the process undertaken by the appellants amounted to manufacture. Consequently, the value of clearances of these goods has to be taken into account for the purpose of exemption Notification No. 83/83, dated 1-3-1983 as the Notification in question talks of the aggregate value of clearances of excisable goods and the removal of excisable goods under Bond without payment of duty to my mind is also clearance. 19. The case law cited at the Bar by the appellants is not apt to the present case as these cases deal with the different situation, that is to say, in those cases the question was whether the value of the export of `Fare Meters' to Ceylon was to be included or not while computing the aggregate value of clearances. Sd/- (G.P. Agarwal) Member (J) 20.In the result, I uphold the impugned Orders and reject the appeal. In view of the difference of opinion between Hon'ble Member (Judicial) and the Vice President the matter is submitted to the Hon'ble President for reference to a third Member on the fol....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l Excise Tariff Item No. 19 and that of man-made fabrics falling under Central Excise Tariff Item No. 22 cleared under Bond for home consumption for further processing had exceeded Rs. 25 lakhs in the preceding financial year. Sub-rule (5) of Rule 96D provides as under :- "If cotton fabrics or jute manufacturers or man-made fabrics after being processed, are removed without payment of duty to one or more factories for the purposes of further processing, or to the originating factory, such removal, shall be subject to and, in accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (3)." Sub-rule (3) of Rule 96D reads as under :- "When cotton fabrics or jute manufactures or man-made fabrics are removed from the factory where they are manufactured, to another factory including a processing factory, the consignor shall follow the procedure as required by rules, 156A and 156B as modified by rule 173N." 26. Rule 156A prescribes the procedure in respect of goods removed from one warehouse to another. Rule 156B relates to the failure to present triplicate application to the Officer-in-charge of the warehouse of removal. Rule 173N modifies the warehousing provisions as contained in C....