Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New Feature Launched βœ•

Introducing the β€œIn Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.

  • βš–οΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
  • πŸ” Narrow down results with higher precision

Try it now in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1994 (6) TMI 78

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppellants. Shri K.K. Dutta, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. - All the above appeals arise out of a common order dated 13-3-1985 of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), New Delhi and are hence taken up for hearing together and disposed of by this common order. The issues for determination herein are : 1. Whether Wheel Barrow (Manually operated)....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... being put to multifarious use for carrying out types of loads etc. and therefore, cannot be considered as agricultural implements. We find that the benefit of notification has been extended in the cases of sales to agricultural organisations and the demand for the period 1-4-1978 to 26-9-1989 and subsequently for the period from 27-9-1981 to 31-3-1982 has been confirmed only in respect of wheel b....