Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1993 (12) TMI 143

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....]. -  In this case, the appellants had received Tungsten Carbide powder and tungsten metal powder from their factory situated at Kudal under the provisions of the Notification No. 118/75, dt. 30-4-1975, before 1-3-1986 without payment of Central Excise duty under Chapter X procedure. The said Notification No. 118/75 was rescinded by the Notification No. 186/86, dt. 1-3-1986. Therefore, the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....should be done from the manufacturer of said goods who has supplied the goods under Chapter X procedure. They also stated that the subject goods being intermediate goods to be used in their final product, the benefit of the Notification No. 118/75 withdrawn from 1-3-1986 was again restored by the Notification No. 217/86, dated 2-4-1986, with retrospective effect. The Hon'ble Tribunal in the case o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 1-3-1986. The said Notification was very much in force when the goods were received under Chapter X procedure. Therefore, the allegation cannot be sustained. Once, the goods have been received as per the provisions of the Rules and the Notification during the relevant time, the only other requirement is whether the goods are used for the purposes indicated in the Notification. Even though, the s....