1986 (7) TMI 302

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri S. Krishnamurthy, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per: K.L. Rekhi, Member (T).]. - The appellant's prayer is that - (1) their ex-factory sale prices should form the basis for determination of assessable value of their products, or (2) alternatively, all elements of cost which come under the category of "actual transportation charges" should be deducted from destination sale pric....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... It is the quantification of these charges that has given rise to the present appeal. 4. The appellants submitted the following break-up figures for "handling and forwarding charges" to the Assistant Collector. District Sales Details .... Cost per crate Distribution charges .... 0.65 Transportation charges to Agents .... 0.65 Vehicle expenditure  .... ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s, the Assistant Collector allowed deduction of Rs. 0.65 and Rs. 0.55 towards "transportation charges to agents" as claimed in the above break-up and disallowed all other items. In appeal, the Appellate Collector allowed deduction of loading and unloading charges also and confirmed rejection of the remaining items. 5. On careful consideration, we hold that (i) vehicle expenditure, (ii) in....