Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1992 (11) TMI 200

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ones and parts of flourmills falling under 8485.90 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. They filed classification list effective from 13-9-1988 claiming classification of Emery Millstones under sub-heading 6801.90 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and claimed exemption under Notification No. 111/88. The lower authorities were of the view they were not entitled to the exemption and the matter was adjudicated and order was passed by the Assistant Collector on 30-1-1989 denying the exemption. The matter was taken in appeal thereafter and at that stage they put forth a new ground saying that Heading 68.01 covers millstones without frame work and that since their millstones are fitted with frame work, they fall outside the purview of Heading 68.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ory Notes to say that Millstones of Chapter 68 have been excluded from Chapter 84 by Note to Section XVI. On the other hand, the learned advocate referred to HSN at Page-900 in which it is clearly stated that the stones which are to be considered for classification under 68.04 must be without frame works and that those with frame works are to be classified under Chapter 84 and 85. The learned Counsel further urged that the declaration meant for classifying the goods under Item 68 CET will not be conclusive as has been held by the Collector (Appeals). The following case law were cited for the ratio of Tribunal in considering classifications of parts of machines - 1. 1989 (44) E.L.T. 160 (Tribunal) - Katrala Products (P) Ltd. v Collector o....