1992 (9) TMI 222

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rder per : S. Kalyanam, Member (J)]. - On going through the records we find that the above appeals have been filed by the Department against the order of the Collector of Customs & Central Excise (Appeals), Madras dated 20-3-1988, on 3-11-1989. When the appeals were taken up for hearing on 5-11- 1990, Shri Suganchand Jain, Advocate for the Respondents took a preliminary objection that the appea....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rt running from the date of receipt of the impugned order under Section 129A (3) of the Customs Act, the Act for short. Today Shri J.M. Jeyaseelan, the learned D.R. submits that the impugned order copy was sent by the Collector (Appeals) only by ordinary post and not by Registered post, even though incorrectly it is stated in the impugned order that the impugned order was sent by Registered post. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mits before us that the impugned order copy was sent under ordinary post. If it was by hand delivery, it should have been indicated as such. In any case in support of the plea of the DR that the impugned order copy was sent by ordinary post, or despatched by hand delivery, no evidence has been produced. On the contrary, in the Register regularly maintained during the course of the business in the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., Madras. We further note that the Respondents had only filed appeals under the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 as the cause title in the impugned order would read "Order-in-Appeal No. 83 & 84/88 (M) G.C.". We further note that in the absence of any appeal under the Customs Act, 1962, the Collector (Appeals), proceeded to give his findings under the said Act. We also note that in respect of the finding o....