Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1991 (12) TMI 164

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ts claimed concessional assessment under Notification No. 32/86 read with Notification No. 126/86 at 100% + 45% without C.V. duty. The value of the consignment was declared at Rs. 78,636,95 P. CIF and Rs. 79,227/- as assessable value. They also filed Import licence dated 16-3-1988 of M/s. Nupur Carpets Ltd., Srinagar which had been transferred in their favour and another licence dated 22-3-1988 of M/S. Bazaz Orient Teppione, Srinagar, also transferred in their favour. The goods have been examined by selecting 10% of the bales in the presence of DRI staff. The representative samples were drawn, sealed and sent for test in the presence of the importers/clearing agent. The chemical report revealed that 5.4% of the representative samples were f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....elease of the consignment. It was also submitted during the personal hearing before the adjudicating authority that the fibrous mass and fibrous dust were of no value to them and that the duty should not be charged on the fly waste as it had no market value. During the personal hearing, the question of enhancement of value came up and the same was decided by the importer by relying on a letter from M/s. Kadokura & Co. Japan. 3. The learned Addl. Collector held that the department had failed to establish the case of enhancement of value of soft waste as it was not supported by any invoice and accepted the importer's plea of the goods being of acrylic variety. However, he rejected the appellants' contention that 5.4% of the goods were fly wa....