Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1991 (8) TMI 197

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ailing of Modvat provision was withdrawn for the appellants vide Notification No. 203/87 dated 9-9-1987 with effect from 1-10-1987. Appellants state that there are some inputs in stock for which they had taken credit of duty and utilised the same in payment of duty on final products. Similarly they have some inputs which had already been converted into final products but the said final products were not cleared within the factory, upon payment of duty. The Asst. Collector in the impugned order has held that since the parties are not eligible for the above credit, the same is disallowed". 2. The learned Collector (Appeals) has relied upon the judgment of the Tribunal while allowing this appeal in the case of Collector of Central Excise, Ban....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing the said inputs duty will have to be collected on such inputs since the final products i.e. Aerated water" was no longer covered under MODVAT Scheme. It was also decided that the duty on unutilised inuts lying in stock as on 1-10-1987 should be recovered either through a debit to credit balance if any lying in RG 23A account or through a debit to PLA. As per the Board's letter action taken in disallowing Modvat Credit is in order". 4. The learned SDR reiterated the grounds of appeal. 5. The learned Consultant for the Respondents pleaded that in similar cases the Tribunal has upheld the order of the Collector (Appeals) where credit already taken either became exempted or came to be deleted from the list of eligible items under Rule 57A....