1991 (9) TMI 175

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ri Willingdone, Advocate, for the Appellant. None, for the Respondent. [Order]. - This is an application in form E.A. 2 filed by the Department for review of the Order-in-Original No. D/6/90 dated 8-1-1990 passed by the Asstt. Collector, for review under Section 35E(4) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The brief facts of the case are that M/s. Miles India Ltd., Baroda, are engage....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... given broad description and they have also utilised the inputs in their final products. He therefore, condoned the lapses and allowed the credit, by dropping the demands. The case of the Department for review of this order is that the manufacturers are required to declare the Heading and Sub-heading of each inputs for availing credit thereon. The respondent have given only Chapter Heading which d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... respondents in their counter in reply to E.A. 2 application. The issue involved here is whether the impugned order of the Asstt. Collector, allowing Modvat credit on the inputs, when the respondents have not given the detailed description as per Heading and Sub-heading, but giving broad description of the inputs can be sustained. 4. The Department does not dispute the fact that the respondent ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....not be sufficient ground for denial of Modvat credit. The Asstt. Collector after due verification of the case has arrived at the conclusion that the respondents have broadly described the inputs though they did not give specific Heading and Sub-heading and they have received the inputs under proper duty paid documents, and the inputs have been consumed by them in the manufacture of their final pro....