Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1991 (2) TMI 272

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....bad wherein the Asstt. Collector under the provisions of Section 11B of the C. Ex. and Salt Act, 1944 rejects in toto all the three refunds claims of (i) Rs. 2,26,168.42 (ii) Rs. 35,065.80 and (iii) Rs. 57,896.27 of the appellants. 2. Being aggrieved by the above impugned order the appellants filed this appeal petition and requested for personal hearing. Accordingly personal hearing was granted. Shri L.B. Attar, Manager (Excise & Customs) on behalf of the appellants appeared before me for personal hearing on 25-1-1991. During the course of personal hearing he reiterated the submissions made in the appeal memorandum and relied on the following orders :- (i) The CEGAT, Special Bench 'C', New Delhi order in the case of German Remedies Limite....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Aurangabad. However, under mistake they paid the duty on the Aluminium and Copper Scraps. The department assessed the RT-12 returns without giving credit of duty paid on Aluminium and Copper Scraps. Therefore, they filed the three refund claims No. 41/87 dated 11-8-1987 for Rs. 2,26,168.47 for the duty paid on Aluminium Scrap during the period 6-1-1987 to 4-6-1987, No. 7/187 dated 26-11-1987 for Rs. 57,896.27 for the duty paid on the Aluminium Scrap during the period 6-7-1987 to 16-8-1987 and No. 6/87 dated 4-8-1987 for Rs. 35,065.80 for the duty paid on Copper Scrap during the period 5-1-1987 to 27-6-1987. The Asstt. Collector in the impugned order has rejected the said refund claims. Being aggrieved by the said order they submit the grou....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re no such conditions in Notification No. 172/84-C.E. and 182/84-C.E. by which the learned Asstt. Collector has rejected the refund claims. The said amendment has come into existence only on 2-11-1987 whereas the duties on copper scrap and aluminium scrap are paid much before the amendment. They therefore pray to set aside the impugned order and to order the department to refund the duty paid on Copper and Aluminium Scraps." 4. I have carefully gone through the appeal petition and the submissions made during the course of personal hearing as well as the Order-in-Original appealed against. It is observed that the appellants manufacture two wheeled and three wheeled Motor vehicles falling under Chapter 87 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 19....