Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1991 (1) TMI 302

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The present appeal is directed against the order-in-appeal No. PPM-326/RK-57/87 dated 16-12-1987 passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay rejecting the appeal filed against the Memorandum issued in File No. V-14D(18)-1/MN/85/REC dt. 29-8-1988, issued by the Additional Collector of Central Excise, Jamnagar, so far as it relates to the intimation given thereunder, regarding adjust....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tity and directed them to make payment of  Rs. 8643.13. The appellants, vide their letter dated 21-8-1985 however objected to the said direction, and pleaded that they were entitled to utilise the said credit towards the duty on any finished product. The same was however not replied, and instead, vide memorandum mentioned hereabove, the Assistant Collector ordered the adjustment of the s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....given. Relying on the decision of CEGAT SRB in Beehive Foundry Engineering Works v. CCE, - 1986 (23) E.L.T. 496 (Tri.) = 1986 (7) ETR 141, he submitted that the letter from the Supdt. could not be considered as an order confirming demand and order of the Assistant Collector, adjusting the said amount against the other refund claimed sanctioned was not correct, and the same has to be set aside. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mination here is, whether the Supdt. could have demanded such an amount, and that too, without issue of any show cause notice and without hearing the party in that regards. 7. Demand for such credit, even assuming to have been wrongly availed of, can be raised as provided for in Rule 56A(5) of the Central Excise Rules, and as per the provisions of the said Rule, the authority competent to raise....