Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1990 (12) TMI 247

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Sankararaman, Member (T)]. - M/s. Cans & Closures Ltd. have filed this appeal aggrieved with the Order-in-Appeal dated 26-2-1990 passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Calcutta whereby he set aside the Order-in-Original dated 4-2-1989 passed by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Rishra Division, allowing the appeal filed by the Assistant Collector (Tribunal and Review) un....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....leaning compound merely cleaned the raw material and did not emerge in the manufacture of any final product and that the coating reducers and other reducers which are used to reduce the specific gravity of some products or as a diluent and are not used in the manufacture of any finished final product. The cleaning of the raw material is an essential process in the manufacture of their product and ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on the ground that these did not relate to Modvat matters but relate to the earlier provisions. Shri Saha contended that these decisions were relevant for Modvat cases also as the scope of the said benefit was wider than the other schemes like proforma credit under Rule 56A or Notification 201/79. Even under these schemes, the decisions cited by them clearly provided that it was not necessary for ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... used for the manufacture of a finished product regardless whether the input constitute a component part of the finished product or not, a manufacturer shall be entitled to the benefit of Notification 178/77. (3) 1985 (21) E.L.T. 285 (CEGAT SRB) - Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Guntur Proforma credit under Rule 56A admissible to lignite used in production of ferro-....