1990 (3) TMI 176

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(Appeals) New Delhi by which he rejected the appeals of the appellants and confirmed the order-in-original Nos. V(15-A) 3-1-82/1360 dated 11-2-1983, No. V-68/18-10/82/5775 dt. 30-6-1983 and No. V(68) 15-9/82/5772 dated 30-6-1983 passed by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise Division, Ujjain. 3. The appellants are manufacturers of HDPE Jerrycans. Prior to 28-2-1982, these goods fell under CET Tariff Item 15A(2) and availed exemption from the whole of duty leviable thereon vide Notification No. 68/71 dated 29-5-1971 as amended till 27-2-1982. By Finance Bill 1982, the description of Item 15A was amended and the goods in question fell out of the scope of Tariff Item 15A and were classifiable under CET item 68 subject to a duty of 8% ad ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....stic Jerrycans manufactured by them falling under TI 68 w.e.f. 28-2-1982. He further held that the appellants' goods were also not covered by any exemption under any notification during the period of demand i.e. from 28-2-1982 to 10-5-1982. He however, held that by Notification No. 182/82 dated 11-5-1982, such HDPE Jerrycans falling under TI 68 were entitled to exemption provided the conditions stipulated in the notification were fulfilled. 6. The Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) upheld the order-in-original passed by the Asstt. Collector of Central Excise, Ujjain, and held that as per section 4 of the Provisional Collections of Taxes Act, the provisions of Finance Bill 1982 came into effect from 28-2-1982. Accordingly, the items fall....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to 7-5-1982 were exempted from payment of whole of excise duty. 8. Shri M.G. Chitnis, Consultant for the appellants, argued the case and submitted that the appellants continued to be covered under Tariff Item 15A(2) till the passing of Finance Act and the exemption which was available to them under the Notification No. 68/71 dated 29-5-1971 as amended till 27-2-1982 and clearances effected from 5-4-1982 to 27-4-1982 and 1-5-1982 to 7-5-1982. He further submitted that Notification No. 149/82 is partly applicable for the demands made in Appeal No. 975/86-C and it is fully applicable to the demands made in Appeal No. 976/86-C. He has relied upon the following citations - Collector of Central Excise, Pune v. M/s. Peico Electronics & Electrica....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fication for the appellants to seek exemption. It is only by Notification No. 149/82 dated 22-4-1982 the appellants could get the exemption to the impugned goods. Hence, the lower authorities have committed an error in rejecting the appellants claim for exemption to their impugned goods from 22-4-1982 onwards. The Collector's findings that the Finance Bill was passed as an Act on 11-5-1982 and that the duty is leviable till this day by the provisions of Section 4 of the Provisional Collection of Taxes Act is not correct. As the effective date of exemption of the Notification No. 149/82 is 22-4-1982, hence the appellants are entitled for duty exemption for clearances made from the date of Notification No. 149/82-CE dated 22-4-1982. The duty ....