1990 (2) TMI 193

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dents. [Order per : R. Jayaraman, Member (T)]. - This is an appeal directed against the Order of the Collector (Appeals) bearing No. SKM-1855/89-BI dated 12-9-1989 rejecting the appellants' appeal on the ground that the refund claim is not legally sustainable, since under Section 11B the same is barred by time. 2.  Shri J.R. Khanvilkar, the learned consultant for the appellants, stated th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a separate claim. In any case, their endorsement on the RT-12 Return should be treated as the date of refund claim and hence the question of applying time limit laid down under Section 11B of the Act does not arise especially when they have complied with the statutory requirement of Rule 173-I of the Rules. 3. After hearing the learned consultant for the appellants, we did not call upon Shri C.P.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t, this rule is subject to the statutory provisions of Sections 11A or 11B, as the case may be. In this view of the matter, a proper claim should have been filed before the Assistant Collector, within the time limit prescribed notwithstanding an endorsement made by them on the RT-12 Return. In any case, such an endorsement made on RT-12 Return cannot be construed as a claim for refund, since the d....