1990 (1) TMI 212

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the Respondents. [Order per : R. Jayaraman, Member (T)]. - This is an appeal directed against the order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) bearing No. GSM-1772/89AHD [File No. V-2(17) 31/AHD/89] dated 24-8-1989. 2. Brief facts for the purpose of disposal of the appeal can be stated as below: 3. The appellants are manufacturers of Dextrose Monohydrate. They bring certain du....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s), he rejected the appeal. The appellants are before us against the aforesaid order. 4. Shri C.S. Khambhaolja, the learned consultant, on behalf of the appellants contended that Redugent (hydrol) is nothing but a by-product occurring in the process of manufacture of dextrose monohydrate. As per the provision of Rule 57D, MODVAT credit is not to be denied to them or varied on the ground that pa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re pleaded that they are entitled to take credit and the credit is not to be denied or varied notwithstanding the fact that an input may be utilised in the manufacture of the by-product. Their case is therefore squarely covered by Rule 57D. He also contended that the inputs are used for the manufacture of dextrose monohydrate and utilisation has taken place before centrifuging and further usage of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....annot be varied or reduced. If it is the final product, because it is chargeable to nil rate, duty credit cannot be extended by virtue of Rule 57C. While the appellants urge for application of Rule 57D, the Department insists on the denial in terms of Rule 57C. 7. After perusing the technical literatures cited by the appellants' learned consultant, we are satisfied that these literatures recogn....