TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2010 (2) TMI 498
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : D.N. Panda, Member (J)]. - The short point in this appeal is whether the un-utilized Cenvat credit of Rs. 22,97,581/- standing to the account of this appellant as on 1-3-2000 in terms of Notification No. 10/2002 dated 1-3-2002 is to be carried forward to meet its consequence in accordance with law subsequently. Show Cause Notice was issued to forfeit the Cen....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e Court and the matter went in favour of the assessee. In that case, Revenue had also disputed that unutilized Cenvat credit not permissible to be used in future. His argument is that when an assessee uses Cenvat credit is immaterial when right to use such credit accrues or arises to make use thereof. 3. Learned DR Shri Vijay Kumar opposes submissions of the appellant on the ground that when the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ued extinguishes without mandate of law. If a right accrued is deniable subsequently, that shall be only permissible by specific statutory provision without being done by mere construction of the scheme. We have examined the order of adjudication as to unutilised credit of Rs. 22.97 lakhs claimed by Appellant for carry forward for further utilisation. But we are unable to find specific mandate in ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ward. 6. Learned Counsel submits that the inputs were dutiable @ 10% while the output was dutiable @ 8%. By mere common sense one can construe that difference in rate of duty may be possible cause of arise of unutilised credit in absence of any finding to the contrary by the learned Adjudicating Authority as to value addition aspect of the goods manufactured, using the input dutiable @ 10%. Quant....