TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2009 (11) TMI 453
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....DR, for the Respondent. [Order per: M.V. Ravindran, Member (J)]. - This application for condonation of delay is filed by the applicants for condonation of delay of 48 days in filing the appeals. 2. Vide our Final Order dated 30-4-2008 [2008 (230) E.L.T. 648 (Tri. Bang.)], we had dismissed applications for condonation of delay and consequently stay petitions and appeals also by holding as under ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ellate Tribunal, by its order, dated 31-8-2005 in S.T. Nos. 16 and 17/2006 dismissed the petitioner's appeal, as the petitioner, despite grant of 14 adjournments, did not care to argue the matter. The Appellate Tribunal rejected the application for the condonation of the delay holding that there is no sufficient ground to con done the delay; consequently the appeal also stood dismissed. 2. Althou....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the matter within 45 days thereafter i.e. from 16-11-2009. 3. The writ petitions are allowed accordingly. All the contentions are kept open." 4. Heard both sides and perused records. It is seen from the records that the Proprietor Mr. Suraj Kumar Prabhu was suffering from serious backache and was under treatment of a qualified medical physician. It is evident from the medical certificate produce....