Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (10) TMI 462

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as delivered by Adarsh Kumar Goel J.- This appeal has been preferred by the Revenue under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, "the Act") against the order dated December 31, 2008, of the Income-tax Appel-late Tribunal, Amritsar Bench, Amritsar passed in I. T. A. No. 388/(ASR)/ 2008, for the assessment year 2001-02, proposing to raise the following question of law : "Whether o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eholders. The Tribunal affirmed the said view. Reliance was placed on following judgments : (i)         Hindustan Steel Ltd. v. State of Orissa [1972] 83 ITR 26 (SC) ; (ii)        CIT v. Kharaiti Lal and Co. [2004] 270 ITR 445 (P&H) ; (iii)       CIT v. Maheshwari Nirman Udyog [2008] 3....