1984 (6) TMI 154

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....out of the order-in-appeal No. 8/49-729/82M dated 7-7-1982 passed by the Collector of Customs (Appeal) Bombay by which he rejected the appellants claim and confirm the order-in-original bearing No. S/8-7-858/81M dated 6-2-1982 passed by the Assistant Collector of Customs, MCD by which rejected the appellants claim for refund holding that their claim does not fall either under Section 23(1) or unde....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pellants, therefore, made an application for refund of proportionate duty paid by them. As stated earlier the Assistant Collector as well as the Collector (Appeals) rejected their claim. 4. Shri V.N. Deshpande learned Advocate for the appellants urged that the authorities below have considered the claim only under Section 13 of the Act and that they have failed to consider the claim under Secti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... had been passed the appellant cannot claim refund under Section 13 of the Act. He also contended that Section 23 has no application since the evidence did not establish total destruction or loss. shri Krishan Kumar contended the loss to the party is not the 'loss' that is contemplated under Section 23. 6. Considered the submissions made on both sides. There is no dispute between the parties th....