Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1985 (2) TMI 179

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ts. [Order per : G. Sankaran, Member (T)]. - The captioned appeal was initially filed as a revision application before the Central Government which, under the provisions of Section 35-P of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944, has come as transferred proceedings to this Tribunal for disposal as if it were an appeal filed before it. 2. The appeal was earlier listed for hearing on 12-11-1984. On....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y in excess of 5% ad val. provided that it was proved to the satisfaction of the Collector that the raw naphtha was intended for use in the manufacture of fertilizer and that Chapter X procedure was followed. During the period from 16-5-1974 to 6-9-1974, the appellants supplied a quantity of 69 M.T. of ammonia produced from raw naphtha (secured under Chapter X procedure) to M/s. SPIC, Tuticorin fo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... an order on 18-7-1979 reducing the amount of duty payable by the appellants. In his own words, he "found it expedient to take this decision without further formalities and issue the speaking order in view of the fact that M/s EID Parry (India) Ltd.'s refund claim consequent to the Court order for a sum of Rs. 4,25,211.82 is pending and I have to deduct the amount due from them from the said refun....