1987 (8) TMI 306

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f the provisions of Section 35P of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 to be disposed of as appeals. Since the issue involved is identical, both the appeals are disposed of by a consolidated order and facts of one of the appeals are stated below. 2. Briefly the facts of the case are that the appellant submitted price lists for approval of the assessable values in respect of N.D. Blocks of 15/16, 18/19 and 24/25 mm thickness on 8.6.78 effective from 1.6.78. The assessee was allowed to clear the goods provisionally on the value declared by them on the ground that they did not submit any sale bills etc. in support of the assessable value claimed for approval. The appellant had submitted sale bills in respect of sales of N.D. Blocks from Bo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Tribunal. 3. Shri N. Mookherjee, Ld. Advocate, has appeared on behalf of the appellant. He has pleaded that in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India v. Bombay Tyre International Ltd. reported in 1983 E.L.T. 1896 (S.C.) and in the case of Assistant Collector of Central Excise and Others v. Madras Rubber Factory Ltd. and Others reported in 1987 (27) E.L.T. 553 (S.C.) the appellant should be allowed the following deductions :- (1) taxes (2) transport (3) interest on receivables (4) cost of distribution (5) discount. Shri Mookherjee, the Ld. Advocate, has pleaded that the matter may be remanded for de novo adjudication with the direction that the Ld. Assistant Collector should allow deduction....