1988 (9) TMI 143

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....an, Advocate, for the Respondents. [Order per : K.L. Rekhi, Member (T)].  - Landing charges are levied by the respective port authority on goods imported into India. Such charges normally work out, on an average, to around 1 % of the C.I.F. price of the goods. As a part of the cost of delivery of the goods at the place of importation, these charges form a component of the assessable val....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rges at the average rate of 1% were added to their C.I.F. price. However, in the present case, the Ld. Collector (Appeals), accepted the claim of the respondents that the actual amount of landing charges alone should be added for arriving at-the assessable value. The department, purturbed by the implications of this order is now in appeal before us. 4. We cannot support the Ld. Appellate Collec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a fraction of the import price and the difference between the average amount and the actual amount would further be a fraction of that fraction. A Division Bench of the Hon'ble High Court [1982 E.L.T. 203 (Guj.)] M/s. Prabhat Cotton & Silk Mills Ltd. v. Union of India had an occasion to comment adversely on the litigation involved in numerous challenges to validity of inclusion of landing charges ....