Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1987 (10) TMI 189

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pondent. [Order per : S. Kalyanam, Member (J)]. -  C/Stay/524/87/MAS. - This is an application for waiver of prior deposit of penalty of Rs. 2,000/- imposed on the petitioner under the impugned order of the Additional Collector of Customs, Tiruchy, dated 1-6-1987. 2. Since we propose to dispose of the appeal itself today with the consent of the parties, we grant waiver of prior deposit of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....there is hardly no evidence on record to indicate that the Customs Officer had reason to believe that the currency in question represented the sale proceeds of contraband goods so as to clothe the Customs authority with jurisdiction to seize the same under Section 110 of the Act. The learned counsel also produced a Communication dated 5-3-1987 signed by the Assistant Collector, which is to the eff....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ve any specific instruction in this regard. 6. We have carefully gone through the entire case records. We should confess, we do not find an iota of evidence against the appellant to hold that the currency of Rs. 55,050/- seized from her represented the sale proceeds of contraband goods. We also do not find any material on record to show that the Customs authorities either entertained a reasonable....