Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1983 (10) TMI 181

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....F.D'Souza, Member (T)]. - This is an appeal under Section 35B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 by the Collector of Central Excise, Baroda against Order No. V(22)18-73/79-R, dated 7-2-1983 passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) Bombay. 2. The facts of the case are that the Respondents manufacture man-made fabrics falling under Tariff Item 22(i) of the Central Excise Schedu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of limitation laid down under Rule 11. Collector (Appeals) observed that Notification No. 15012/4/75-Tex-IV/DCH dated 13-10-1978 exempted trade samples and chindies of man-made fabrics from handloom cess, giving effect from a date 2 years prior to the publication of the Rules, namely, from 13-10-1976 onwards. This establishes that there was no intention to recover handloom cess during this period.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....case was called, the Respondents were not represented. For the appellant Shri Pattekar strenuously urged that under Rule 11, any refund claim must be made within six months from the date of payment and the claim in this case was rejected as time-barred. He was however unable to satisfy the Tribunal on the intention of the Government in giving retrospective effect to the third Proviso to Rule 2 of ....