Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1986 (10) TMI 235

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....main issue involved is the same namely as to whether the Orissa Forest Corporation Ltd. is the manufacturer of excisable goods and consequently whether it is liable to comply with the Central Excise Laws and procedures and liable to duty and penalty in case of non-compliance. 3. It was, therefore, his request that all these cases could be heard together and a common order could be passed. Shri Mohanty agrees. 4. Shri Thakur submits that in the order-in-appeal against the Collector (Appeals) has remanded back the cases to the Superintendent for de novo adjudication. 5.  In all these cases the Superintendent has imposed a penalty of a small amount of less than Rs. 1000/-. However, these cases are fit for admission for being....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ersion of logs into these products involves transformation, therefore, such conversion is to be treated as manufacture. It is, therefore, his prayer that the order of the Collector (Appeals) may be set aside and the order of the Superintendent may be restored. 10. Shri Mohanty submitted that the Collector (Appeals) was competent to remand the cases back to the Superintendent. Actually the issue as to who is the manufacturer has already been decided by the Collector (Appeals) in his order-in-appeal No. 97/OR/81 dated 26-6-1981 and apparently the intention of the Collector (Appeals) was to direct the Superintendent to take this order-in-appeal into account and pass a proper order keeping this order in view. 11. It was also his....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... at page 3 of his said order he has used the words "This will however, be subjected to the terms and conditions of the lease which requires further examination. Since the terms and conditions of the lease are not known ......." 16.  It is, therefore, apparent that all the facts relevant to the cases were not before the Collector (Appeals) when he passed the order in question. 17. Regarding excisability of the products also the other authorities like Central Board of Excise & Customs had also passed some orders which do not appear to have attracted the attention of the Collector (Appeals). Again the Government of India's Notification No. 75/83 dated 1-3-1983 had also not engaged attention of the Collector (Appeals). The order....