Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1985 (4) TMI 178

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....orders passed by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise. The Assistant Collector held by his Order dated 4-4-1977 that the rich gas and synthetic gas produced by the appellants' fertilizer plant and dispatched to the ' appellants steel plant during the period from 1-3-1975 to 29-4-1975 was liable to be charged with excess duty under Item No. 68 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (CET). In appeal, the Appellate Collector upheld this order. 2. The appellants filed a revision application before the Central Government against the Order of the Appellate Collector. On the setting up of this Tribunal, it was transferred to it under Section 35-P of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, to be disposed of as if....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... having conceded before the Appellate Collector that the demands for duty in respect of earlier part of the demand-period, namely, 1-3-1975 to 5-3-1975 was legally sustainable. 6. Notification No. 58/75, dated 1-3-1975 as amended by Notification No. 77/75, dated 6-3-1975 reads as follows :- "In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1) of Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, the Central Government hereby exempts goods falling under Item No. 68 of the First Schedule of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), which are used in the factory of production as intermediate goods or component part of any goods from the whole of the duty of excise leviable thereon." 7. The requirement in the notification is that the It....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l plant). Shri Bhattacharya contended that both plants were covered by one industrial licence authorising the appellants to produced fertiliser, certain chemicals and iron and steel. Therefore, both the plants constituted one unit. On factory was dependent on the other. 9.  The expression "factory" has been defined by Section 2(m) of the Factories Act, 1948. All premises conforming to the said definition are required to be registered as factories with the authorities administering the Factories Act. It is Shri Bhattacharya's contention that the purpose of registration of premises as factories is, as the preamble to the Factories Act could indicate, to regulate labour in factories. It may be that the purpose of the Factories Act is to ....