Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1985 (5) TMI 149

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....spondents. [Order]. - The questions that arise for consideration in this Appeal are whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case - (a) the personal penalty in a sum of Rs.10,000/- levied on the Appellant is to be reduced; and (b) the absolute confiscation of the goods, in question (namely watches) is to be converted to one for redemption on the payment of a suitable fine. 2. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....five times of the value of the goods in the discretion of the Adjudicating Officer or One Thousand Rupees whichever is greater. The quantum of levy - five times the value of the goods - is inflexible except where such value is less than a Thousand Rupees. When the legislature thought it fit to quantify the penalty as an alternative between two sums of money - whichever greater there is no room for....