Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1985 (9) TMI 194

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....emical test, the fabrics were found to be of nylon X viscose composition which made them liable to higher tariff values and consequently higher amount of central excise duty. In the follow-up action, a small part (87 pieces) out of the same lot of goods and carrying the same brand name "Roop Rani" were seized at the premises of a dealer at Ahmedabad also. On stock-taking, certain shortages and other irregularities were noticed in the appellants factory. On adjudication of all the violations noticed, the Collector confiscated the fabrics involved, giving option for their release on payment of redemption fine, demanded difference in duty which was found to be payable and further imposed a penalty of rupees one lakh on the appellants under Rul....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he department but though the appellants were asking for copies of the said test report and the statements, the department had not made them available to the appellants. Instead, the Collector as well as the Board presumed the fabrics seized at Ahmedabad as of nylon X viscose composition on the sole ground that they carried the brand name "Roop Rani" and that fabrics carrying this brand name which were tested from the Surat lot were found to be nylon X viscose. The appellants believed that the test report and traders' statements were in their favour and that the department had deliberately kept them back. This, according to them, violated the principles of natural justice.  (2)  Following the Gujarat High Court judgment in the wel....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the case record from the Collector and that the Collector had informed her last month that the said record was lying in the Ministry's office at Delhi. In response to our query, she stated that thereafter no effort had been made to get the record from the Ministry's office. 4.  We have carefully considered the matter. Taking the appellants' second plea first, we find that in their judgment [1985 (20) E.L.T 179 S.C.] in the case of Messrs. Empire Industries Ltd., the Supreme Court have reversed the Gujarat High Court judgment in Vijaya Textiles-1979 E.L.T. (J 181) case. The Supreme Court have held that etymologically bleaching, dyeing, printing etc. of fabrics amounted to manufacture. The implication of this is that even without takin....