Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1982 (11) TMI 92

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....low the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of Manubai A. Seth & Ors. vs N.D. Nirgudkar, ITO & Ors. (1981) 22 CTR (Bom) 41 : (1981) 128 ITR 87 (Bom) and exclude from the assessments capital gains arising from the agricultural lands belonging to the assessee. It was contented firstly on behalf of the revenue that the lands in question were not actually cultivated and not being agricultura....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....come and such income being agricultural income could not be taxed was contrary to the reasoning adapted by the Delhi High Court in the case of D.L.F. Housing & Construction (P) Ltd vs CIT (1982) 19 CTR (Del) 199 : (1983) 141 ITR 806 (Del). But, we cannot ignored the decision of the Bombay High Court which is binding on us especially when it has been held that unless the definition of the 'capital ....