1982 (9) TMI 157
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....lied the ITO within time for the issue of challan for payment of fee for filing the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal but such a challan was received by him only in June, 1982 and that in the circumstances the delay was unavoidable. The correctness of this submission has not been satisfactorily controverted by the revenue. I am, therefore, satisfied that there was sufficient cause for the delay....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., the ld. Counsel for the assessee vehemently urged the ITO as well as the AAC did not dispute the factum of the payment of salary to the aforesaid two persons. He pointed out that the ITO did not disallow the claim on the ground that no services were rendered by them and that the AAC had erred in holding that the members aforesaid did not render any service to the assessee. On behalf of the reven....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI