Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1995 (11) TMI 135

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the ground that the Dy. CIT(A) is not justified in confirming the assessment order passed under s. 143(1)(a) of the Act, as his order is opposed to the facts of the case. The brief facts of the case are as under. 3. For the assessment year under consideration, the assessee filed return of income admitting a total income of Rs. 39,770. The assessment was completed under s. 143(1) of that Act. Wh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f the shopping complex. As against this order of the AO, the assessee appealed before the Dy. CIT(A), before whom the learned counsel for the assessee contended that disallowing of interest does not come under prima facie adjustments to be made while processing the return under s. 143(1). He contended that the AO should have taken the case for scrutiny if he doubted the genuineness of the interest....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ny of the instances cited in the said circular, the AO was not justified in disallowing the assessee's claim in an order passed under s. 143(1) of the Act. He relied upon the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of Khatau Junkar Ltd. & Anr. vs. CIT (1992) 102 CTR (Bom) 194 : (1992) 196 ITR 55 (Bom), wherein it was held by their Lordships that the ITO cannot make prima facie disallowance o....