Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1989 (11) TMI 116

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....venty-four months for any reason whatsoever, the power of revocation will lapse. (iii) During the said period of seventy-four months the transfer shall be irrevocable and the transferor will have no right, title or interest whatsoever in or upon the said property consisting of 27 items and the transferee only should own and enjoy the said property as absolute owner and also deal with the same in the manner it may like. (iv) The transferee is bound to return the said property (27 items) as soon as the transferor revokes the transfer. (v) The notice of revocation of the transfer shall be given by the transferor in writing to the registered address of the transferee and that shall be treated as a valid service. (vi) The transferee is bound to keep the schedule property in the same state as far as practicable in which the said property is found at the time of transfer, provided always that the transferee had the powers to change, alter or remake the said property or ornaments made weight by weight or otherwise. (vii) It is expressly understood that the transferor shall not derive any benefit direct or in direct under any circumstances from the said property and the transferor relinquis....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the GT Act and r. 11 of the GT Rules. 4. As against the impugned order the Revenue came up in second appeal before this Tribunal. We have heard Shri Anil Kumar, the learned departmental representative and Dr. Gowri Shankar, the learned advocate for the assessee. It is admitted before us that the donor (assessee) along with her husband and her husband's brother are the directors and shareholders of the donee-company M/s M&L Investments Pvt. Ltd. Dr. Gowri Shankar did not dispute that there is a transfer involved in this transaction evidenced by the letter dt. 14th April, 1982, which is already adverted to supra. His contention, however, is that the transfer does not amount to gift. It is also submitted before us that for the asst. yrs. 1984-85 and 1986-87 the donee was showing these assets (27 items of jewellery) as part of its wealth in its wealth-tax returns filed for those assessment years. It is also submitted that the assessee exercised her right of revocation in July, 1989, and from the asst. yr. 1989-90 the assessee only had included these asses as part of her wealth. Dr. Gowri Shankar argued that simply because the transaction involves transfer it does not necessarily am....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Act deals only with a situation in which there is a complete divestment at least for a limited period and tolerates a gratuitous transfer which is irrevocable for a limited time within the concept of a gift under the GT Act." Dr. Gowri Shankar argued that there can be revocable transfer, revocable gift after some time and there can be irrevocable gift. However, under the ordinary acceptation of the term 'gift' a transfer should be irrevocable. So for purposes of gift-tax also a revocable transfer cannot be taken to be a gift. There must be compelling words in the statute to show that a revocable gift after some time also comes within the definition of gift under the GT Act. Unless such a definition is there in the GT Act a revocable gift should not be taken to be a gift at all, as ordinarily gift is ways an irrevocable gift. Since in this case the gift is revocable after certain period, namely 74 months, such a gift should be taken to have not been comprehended under the GT Act and, therefore, the present gift is not at all taxable under the Gift-tax provisions. Further, the learned advocate argued that in order to explain the provisions of s. 4(5) of the WT Act the word 'irrevo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ifferent varieties as well as irrevocable gifts or transfers. Out of revocable gifts of many sorts, the legislature in its wisdom thought it fit to choose only revocable gifts after a specified period for purposes of levy of gift-tax. In the absence of definition of irrevocable transfer just like the one available under s. 4, Explanation, of the WT Act, for purposes of gift-tax even if a gift is revocable after any specified period, which is not necessarily over a period of more than six years, is also a gift within the meaning of the GT Act. For instance, a gift which is revocable after a period of one year, in our understanding is a taxable gift within the meaning of s. 6(2) of the GT Act. In our opinion it is enough if the period of revocation is specified in the deed of gift. That period may be any specified period like one year or two years or three years and so on. Further, s. 126 of the Transfer of property Act cannot be applicable to a question which arises under the GT Act. At page 480 of (1974) 95 ITR 476 (Bom), the essentials to be seen before deciding whether there is any gift involved in a transaction or not, are held to be as follows: "What the court must, therefore,....